More recently, a news report on a letter placing a security penalty record has attracted widespread public attention. According to reports, security records are likely to be incorporated into the individual letter-and-letter system, as one of the factors considered for credit. This news has triggered a ferocious debate among netizens, which has been questioned as affecting personal credit records or even being able to rent or buy a house. So, what's going on with the letter of arrest? This is discussed in depth from several angles。

Is that a police charge

I. THE PERSONAL RIGHT TO PRIVATE HOUSING

First, would it violate the individual ' s right to privacy by placing a warrant for police punishment? Because the right to privacy of individuals has always been at the centre of social concerns. Security records, as a form of administrative punishment, are closely linked to personal privacy. The inclusion of security records in the system of letters of call would, however, necessarily involve personal privacy. However, the current law does not provide for this, and the policy is formulated in vague terms, simply indicating that measures will be taken to protect the privacy of the individual. Therefore, further attention is required as to whether the inclusion of security penalties in the system of letters of acknowledgement violates the right to privacy of individuals。

II. The relationship between policing and personal credit

Secondly, what is the relationship between policing and personal credit? Most people believe that security record-keeping is part of the credit rating, leading to a downgrading of credit ratings for those who have been subjected to security sanctions, thereby affecting all aspects of renting, buying and even seeking grades. But should public order sanctions be part of the credit rating, and is it reasonable? This requires validation and regulation by the authorities。

III. REALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RECORD OF POSITIONS

Thirdly, whether a letter of request should be recorded for the punishment of public order also depends on its authenticity and validity. As a form of administrative punishment, the record of public order penalties is of a mandatory and dissuasive nature and should be the decision of the security authorities to impose administrative penalties in accordance with the law. In practice, however, there are some problems with the authenticity and validity of record-keeping, such as lack of detail and errors in record-keeping. If these inaccurate records are used as rating factors, they affect the credit records of individuals。

IV. IMPACT ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

Lastly, would it have an impact on the administration of justice by placing a letter placing a security penalty on record? If public order penalties become part of the letters of call, they will have an impact on the work of the security law enforcement authorities, i.e., the understanding of public order penalties has deepened, and the demands of the public at large on the security order have been increasing, thus contributing to the revitalization of law enforcement efforts. However, if, on the contrary, the security penalty becomes part of the letter rating, the work of the security enforcement authorities needs to be used as an indication that some law enforcement officials may be affected and that offences such as unauthorized interference or a change in the disposition of the security penalty may also occur。

In any case, the letter of appeal for the punishment of the public order is multidimensional and, in the long term, it must be explored and resolved in all its aspects, and only by reasonable regulation can everyone ' s fair interests be better protected。