In recent years, attention has been paid to the publication and restriction of lists of persons who have lost their trust. According to the relevant legal provisions, such as the Civil Code and the Act on the Rights and Duties of Citizens, a person who is disbelieving is usually required to bear certain legal consequences and is subject to a certain degree of limitation. So, what's the time limit for a person who lost his trust? In two years? From multiple perspectives, this question is not easy to answer。

Is there no limit in two years

First of all, we need to understand the content and the scope of the breach of trust in response to the question of whether it is necessary to impose restrictive measures. People who have lost their trust are generally those individuals or organizations that have deliberately or unintentionally violated their contractual obligations, tax evasion, non-payment of debts and intellectual property rights, which have resulted in poor records and have been added to the list. Such persons or organizations may be barred from participating in the solicitation of tenders, restrictions on high consumption, restrictions on air travel and public transport such as trains. These restrictions are reasonable and necessary in order to punish breach of trust and protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens。

Secondly, should a person who has lost his or her trust be punished with continued restrictions after a limited period of time? It would also need to consider factors such as the nature of the breach, its consequences and the expression of remorse by the person who did not. The limitation period may be extended appropriately if the breach is serious and has dire consequences and if the person does not act positively to correct the breach and redeem the credit. If the breach is of a minor or negligent nature and the person has demonstrated a willingness and action to make a positive correction, the limitation for a certain period of time may be appropriately lifted。

In addition, consideration needs to be given to the policy and legal environment. As we progress towards the modernization of our socialist society and the further development of the market economy, greater importance is being attached to the construction and maintenance of credit systems. Restriction and discipline for breach of trust are important components of the credit system. Therefore, at the policy and legal levels, there is a need to create a sound credit management mechanism, to clarify the criteria for the identification and treatment of failures of confidence, as well as the time frame and evaluation of the effectiveness of restrictive measures. This will better promote the spread and strengthening of a sense of integrity and enhance the effectiveness and authority of social credit systems。

Finally, specific restrictions and enforcement effects need to be considered. For example, the effectiveness of high-consumption restrictions is not yet clear, and some defiant persons evade restrictions by transferring assets and setting up false accounts. Thus, lessons need to be learned, more scientific and effective restrictions and tools need to be explored, and their implementation effectiveness monitored and evaluated。